Which of the following was not outlined in the Common Rule?

Which of the following was not outlined in the Common Rule?

• A. requirements for informed consent
• B. rules and procedures for IRBs
• C. compliance through the establishment of IRBs
• D. compliance through the abolishment of IRBs

Answer: (D)

The correct answer indicates that compliance through the abolishment of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) is not outlined in the Common Rule. The Common Rule is a federal policy that primarily provides ethical guidelines and protections for research involving human subjects. It establishes significant components, including requirements for informed consent, rules and procedures governing how IRBs operate, and mandates that certain types of research comply with these standards via the establishment of IRBs. Specifically, the Common Rule emphasizes protecting human subjects by requiring researchers to obtain informed consent from participants, outlining specific processes that IRBs must follow to review research proposals, and ensuring that IRBs are in place to monitor compliance with ethical standards. Thus, the notion of abolishing IRBs contradicts the fundamental intent of the Common Rule, as it would undermine the protections meant for research participants. The presence of IRBs is crucial for adhering to the ethical standards established under this framework, making the option referencing their abolishment inconsistent with the principles laid out in the Common Rule.

The correct answer indicates that compliance through the abolishment of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) is not outlined in the Common Rule. The Common Rule is a federal policy that primarily provides ethical guidelines and protections for research involving human subjects. It establishes significant components, including requirements for informed consent, rules and procedures governing how IRBs operate, and mandates that certain types of research comply with these standards via the establishment of IRBs.

Specifically, the Common Rule emphasizes protecting human subjects by requiring researchers to obtain informed consent from participants, outlining specific processes that IRBs must follow to review research proposals, and ensuring that IRBs are in place to monitor compliance with ethical standards. Thus, the notion of abolishing IRBs contradicts the fundamental intent of the Common Rule, as it would undermine the protections meant for research participants. The presence of IRBs is crucial for adhering to the ethical standards established under this framework, making the option referencing their abolishment inconsistent with the principles laid out in the Common Rule.